ICO review of JURY.ONLINE (JOT): valuation, analysis, token cost | Digital Rating Agency
We will call you soon!
This project doesn't have a level of investment attractiveness
No
Rating
High
Quality Rate
No detailed scores
ICO
now
Start: 12/02/2018
End: 30/04/2018

JURY.ONLINE

About

Jury.online enables users to make deals that, if any party is dissatisfied, are reviewed by a panel of jurors that deliver a judgement in favour of one of the parties. Jury.online also gives any person with expertise in a certain field the opportunity to use their experience and knowledge for paid dispute resolution.

Rate history

The DigRate team has assigned a High Quality Rate to the Jury.Online project. Jury.Online is a platform that provides services for the resolution of any kind of disputes with the participation of an independent group of expert judges. The main problems of the market, that the project plans to solve are: high fees for professional legal services, excessive duration of trials and non-enforcement of court decisions. The platform has a flexible smart contract that allows to conduct multilateral transactions, randomize the pool of judges, and also includes a number of approaches that exclude the corruption component of the dispute resolution process. It should be noted that the source codes of the smart contract and protocol have been published on GitHub. The platform will use the escrow function, that allows to transfer funds only if certain conditions are met and if it is confirmed by an independent third party ⎼ escrow agent. However, there is no detailed market overview and competitive advantages (for example, over CrowdJustice) in the whitepaper of the project. The appeal to traditional courts is too time-consuming and expensive in case of disputed transactions with insignificant funds. The Jury.Online platform, using the built-in arbitration system, is trying to resolve disputes outside the framework of state procedural requirements, without violating the requirements of different countries legislation in the field of contractual relations between the parties. Legal recognition of such decisions on disputes by all subjects of contractual relations is also possible. The composition of the team is quite balanced and includes developers of the platform, specialists in marketing, strategic development and other fields. It should be noted that the team members do not have impressive achievements in the field of jurisprudence and the project needs additional legal authority specialists. There is also a roadmap in the whitepaper of the project, although the marketing plan for international expansion has not been worked out yet. The High Quality Rate of the Jury.Online means that the project’s goals, market problems and their solutions are clearly defined, and the team members have the necessary potential for the platform implementation. DigRate experts warn that any investments in crypto assets are high-risk investments.
The DigRate has assigned Quality Rate High to Jury.Online project. Jury.Online is a platform that provides services for the resolution of any kind of disputes with the participation of an independent group of expert judges. The main problems of the market, that the project plans to solve are: high fees for professional legal services, excessive duration of trials and non-enforcement of court decisions. The appeal to traditional courts is too time-consuming and expensive in case of disputed transactions with insignificant funds. The Jury.Online platform using the built-in arbitration system is trying to resolve disputes outside the framework of state procedural requirements, without violating the requirements of different countries legislation in regard to contractual arrangements between the parties. Legal recognition of such decisions on disputes by all subjects of contractual relations is also possible. The platform has a flexible smart contract that allows to conduct multilateral transactions, randomize the pool of judges, and also includes a number of approaches that exclude the corruption component of the dispute resolution process. The Jury.Online system uses the smart contract when making transaction between counterparties, where the initiating party deposits funds in the smart contract according to the declared sum. In case of a disputable situation, independent judges ⎼ participants of the system are involved to complete the transaction. There is a variety of options for selecting a third arbitration party in the flexible system of selection of judges. It is possible to use both the automatic system of selecting the judges, and independently choose judges specializing in a particular field and providing their services in dispute resolution within the platform. Judges do not have information about decisions taken by other judges, and the final verdict on the dispute is made based on the majority of the judges’ votes. Payment to judges is made after the conclusion of a disputed transaction from the blocked funds on a smart contract. Online stores, platforms for freelancers, trading platforms and other Internet companies are interested in services to resolve legal disputes. Instead of having their own legal department, they could entrust this service to members of the Jury.Online system. MarketLine’ business analysts published a report on the state of the global legal services market in 2016 (data for 2017 are not available yet). The market volume is $ 584.4 bn, and the average annual growth in sales of legal services is 2.2%. However, the whitepaper of the Jury.Online lacks a detailed market survey and a description of the competitive advantages of this platform, for example, over Confideal, Ethearnal, RxEAL. It should be noted that the projects Ethearnal and RxEAL are not direct competitors to Jury.Online, since the dispute resolution function is implemented for particular tasks based on the specifics of the remote work and disputes over collateral for leases. The Confideal’s functionality is the closest to the Jury.Online’s, but Confideal has not yet completed the pre-sale stage, nor does it have a randomized selection of arbitrators despite the implemented MVP. The field of dispute resolution is represented by the state judiciary. The project has a number of significant advantages over the centralized judicial system: low financial costs of launching and settling disputes, impartiality of decisions made in disputes, as well as flexibility in choosing rules and conditions for resolving disputes. The project team has developed an alpha version of the product. The source code of the smart contract and the protocol are published on GitHub. The Jury.Online team is quite balanced and includes developers of the platform, experts in marketing, strategic development and other fields. It should be noted that the team members do not have extensive experience and achievements in the field of jurisprudence. The project needs additional specialists in the field of jurisprudence. Successful pre-sale of the Jury.Online, as well as the popularity of the project in social networks and thematic communities demonstrates investors’ interest to the project. The potential of the JOT token directly depends on the distribution of cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment. The services of the platform may be of interest to freelance exchanges and medium-sized online stores. The price of JOT has a growth potential of 2-3 times in the medium term (from three to six months) with medium volatility (up to 30%) in the long term (from six months). More information about the strengths and weaknesses of the project can be found in our review.
Token
JURY.ONLINE

Downloads and links

Website
Review
Whitepaper
Rating scores express an opinion of Digital Rating Agency and do not have any fact-finding mission or recommendations to buy, own, sell any of the assets or take any investment decisions. Digital Rating Agency does not undertake any responsibility for any consequences, interpretations, judgements, recommendations and other actions directly or indirectly related to the rating score, the rating assessments from Digital Rating Agency, any summary and conclusions contained in the rating report and rating releases, or the absence of abovementioned. The only source, depicting the real state of the rating score, is the official site www.digrate.com
Creative Commons
Disclaimer
Лицензия Creative Commons
Rating scores express an opinion of Digital Rating Agency and do not have any fact-finding mission or recommendations to buy, own, sell any assets and take any investment decisions. Digital Rating Agency does not undertake any responsibility for any consequences, interpretations, judgements, recommendations and other actions directly or indirectly related to the rating score, the rating operations conducted by Digital Rating Agency, any summary and conclusions contained in the rating report and rating releases, or the absence of abovementioned. The only source, depicting the real state of the rating score, is official site www.digrate.com